What are the best alternatives to Salesforce?
Pipedrive — Known for its simplicity and intuitive visual pipeline. Ideal for small sales teams that prioritize ease-of-use over complex configurability.
What ChatGPT and Claude tell your buyers about you, who they name instead, which pages they read it from, and the line to change.
| Rival | Named | Above you | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zoho CRM | 2 of 2 | 1 of 2 | |
| Pipedriveyou | 2 of 2 | — | |
| HubSpot | 1 of 2 | 1 of 2 | |
| Close | 1 of 2 | 0 of 2 | |
| Zendesk Sell | 1 of 2 | 0 of 2 |
A buyer at a B2B software company asks three different questions on the way to a decision. One score across all of them hides the one you are losing.
One number across every question. Which question are you losing? Which buyer? Which rival? The score can’t say.
Three questions, three verdicts, each with the answer and the cited page underneath. You see which stage to fix, and the line that fixes it.
Buyers of B2B software ask an assistant before they ask a vendor. The answer names three or four products, cites a handful of pages, and moves on. Below: one real answer, the page it read, and your nearest line — every step quoted and dated.
What are the best alternatives to Salesforce?
Pipedrive — Known for its simplicity and intuitive visual pipeline. Ideal for small sales teams that prioritize ease-of-use over complex configurability.
Zoho CRM offers the broadest low-cost feature set, while Pipedrive is the better choice when a team mainly needs a clear sales pipeline.
One line, where comparison writers look, on what you do beyond the pipeline: automations, email sequences, forecasts, in your own words.
Our readingChatGPT places you as the simple pipeline and credits Zoho with breadth, and the page it cites says the same. Your features page says “advanced Automations”, but not in a line a comparison article would quote.
Every number is a count of saved answers. Click it in the app and the answers are underneath.
Named in 2 of 2 buyer answers · offered in 2 · listed first in 0.
2 buyer answers · ChatGPT · ▲ from your second runOne sentence with its count: named, offered or picked, per answer, per engine. Your rank among the rivals you track, and the change since the last run.
| Rival | League | Above you |
|---|---|---|
| Zoho CRM | same | 1 of 2 |
| HubSpot | same | 1 of 2 |
| Close | same | 0 of 2 |
| Dynamics 365 | above | not compared |
You mark who you actually compete with. “Above you” is counted against them only. The enterprise leader AI keeps naming stays as evidence, not as your benchmark.
Problems first, in buyer terms. Under each: what AI said, the cited page, your nearest line, then the change on your page or theirs.
Not “best CRM”. Questions in your sub-category, for the segment you sell to, at the stage the buyer is in: discovering, comparing, deciding. We write them from your own pages. Keep, edit or remove any before anything is asked.
You see the passage before and after, each with the date we read it.
Asks the same questions again. We show what it costs before it runs.
We don’t promise traffic, and neither check guarantees AI will change its answer. They show you what changed.
Before anything runs, we read your site and propose what you are, who you sell to and your rivals. You edit, then confirm. Nothing is asked or charged until you do.
Your questions, by stage, on ChatGPT and Claude.
We open every cited page and read the line that backs the answer.
On your site, on theirs, on the pages AI reads. Verbatim, linked.
Problems first, the change under each, re-checked on the next run.
Built for B2B software: a product a company buys for its team, with rivals and a buying committee. Not for consumer brands, local businesses or e-commerce catalogues — the questions a buyer asks there are not the ones we write.
We read your site and propose what you are, who you sell to and who you compete with. You edit. The cost is on the screen. Nothing is asked or charged until you confirm.
Your questions on ChatGPT and Claude, the answers, the cited pages, your nearest line, what to change. No card.
Check my visibility →or read a real report first →Runs on a schedule, change since last run, every page of the dashboard. The price is on the Pricing page and on the confirm screen before each run.
See pricing →Each client gets their own rivals, questions and report. Set once by the account manager, repeated every run.
AI visibility for B2B agencies →I build AI systems for a living. Every AI answer here is treated as data: stored, traced to its sources and checked.
If a claim isn’t on the page it cites, the report doesn’t show it as backed. No invented numbers, no filler.
Questions and feedback about your report reach me, not a support queue.
I’m working with a few B2B SaaS teams on deeper reports. Want to be one of them? Email me →
ChatGPT and Claude today. Each run asks every question on both. Engines are added when we can save and cite their answers the same way.
You run it. One run is one snapshot; change over time starts from your second run. A weekly schedule is on the way.
There is no rank in an AI answer. We save the answer, mark whether you are named, offered or picked, open the pages it cited, and find the line on your site or theirs that would change it. Trackers report mentions and scores; this shows the evidence and the change.
You see the cost of the run on the confirm screen, before anything is asked. No credit card for your first run.
From your own pages. We read them, propose what you are, who you sell to and your rivals, and write buyer questions for that sub-category by stage. You edit all of it before confirming.
There is a separate page for that. Every client gets their own rivals, questions and report under one account.
Your domain, then a confirm screen with the cost. Nothing runs until you say so.
Agency with B2B software clients? AI visibility for B2B agencies →